Executive CV, rebuilt
Clean parsing structure, correct section headers, role-matched terminology, and no layout elements that break extraction — then edited so it still reads sharply to the human on the other side.
Take them individually, or run all three as a single engagement — which is where the compounding happens. Below is exactly what each one includes, how it runs, and who it is for.
Assets that survive the filter and hold a recruiter's attention.
The problem
At the executive level, a CV has two very different audiences and most documents are written for neither. The first reader is a parser that cares about structure, section headers, and terminology. The second is a human who gives the page roughly six seconds before deciding. A document tuned for one of those reliably fails the other.
Our approach
We rebuild from the requisition backwards. We take the roles you are actually targeting, extract the language and competencies those postings reward, and reconstruct your track record around scope, decisions, and outcomes rather than duties. Then we pressure-test the result against both audiences.
Clean parsing structure, correct section headers, role-matched terminology, and no layout elements that break extraction — then edited so it still reads sharply to the human on the other side.
Headline, About, and experience rewritten for recruiter search behaviour. We target the queries recruiters in your sector actually run, so you appear in the shortlist rather than the long tail.
A short-form bio for board packs, introductions, and speaker pages, plus a reusable letter framework you can adapt per role in ten minutes instead of an hour.
We interrogate your history for scope, budget, headcount, and measurable result — the details that separate a director-level story from a manager-level one — and write them into every bullet.
What changes
The room-by-room strategy for turning interviews into offers.
The problem
Senior interviews are not knowledge tests. They are judgement tests, and they are usually lost in the same three places: a weak answer to why this role now, a story bank that describes activity rather than impact, and a negotiation entered without a benchmark or an alternative.
Our approach
We rehearse against the real thing. Your actual panel, your actual role, the questions that function tends to ask. Sessions are recorded so you can hear what the room hears, and every session ends with a specific, written correction rather than general encouragement.
Working sessions against your live pipeline — which roles to push, which to decline, how to sequence processes so your strongest option is not also your earliest deadline.
Full-length panels run against the real format, recorded and reviewed line by line. We rebuild the answers that are costing you and drill them until they are automatic.
Eight to twelve rehearsed stories, each mapped to the competencies your target roles screen for, structured so they hold up under follow-up questions rather than collapsing on the second why.
A real benchmark for your band, geography, and sector, plus a written negotiation plan: your number, your walk-away, the sequence of asks, and the language for each one.
What changes
We run the search. You show up to the interviews.
The problem
A serious executive search is a part-time job. Sourcing, tailoring, submitting, tracking, following up, and opening direct lines to decision-makers is roughly fifteen hours a week done properly. Almost nobody in a demanding role has that, so the search gets done badly in the margins — and a badly run search reads as a weak candidate.
Our approach
We take the execution off your desk entirely. You approve a written mandate and the voice we use on your behalf; after that we source, write, submit, and follow up, and you get a shared tracker plus a report every Friday. You spend your time on interviews, which is the only part that genuinely requires you.
A signed-off definition of the roles we hunt and the ones we deliberately ignore, then 100–150 companies mapped against it with the decision-makers who own each requisition identified by name.
Every application tailored to the specific requisition and submitted for you. No volume blasting — each one is written against the posting it is answering.
Personalized multi-channel outreach in your name, referencing their team and their open role, so you enter the conversation ahead of the queue rather than inside it.
A shared pipeline board you can open at any hour, plus a Friday report: what was submitted, who was contacted, what came back, and what we are adjusting next week.
What changes
Retainers
Every retainer is scoped to your target role, sector, and market. Pricing is set on the audit call, once we know what the search actually requires.
Positioning retainer
You're running the search yourself and your materials aren't converting.
Flagship · Fully operated
You want the search run for you, end to end, by a named operator.
Conversion retainer
Interviews are landing. They're not converting into offers.
Questions
Still unsure which service fits your situation? Bring it to the audit call — we'll tell you plainly if none of them do.
Yes — that is the core of Reverse Recruiting. We source the roles, write each application against the specific requisition, and submit them on your behalf. You review the target list and approve the mandate up front; after that, the submission work is ours.
It does, and you sign off on the voice before anything sends. We draft the scripts during positioning, you approve them, and every message is personalized to the recipient's team and open role. Nothing generic goes out under your name.
Timelines vary with seniority, sector, and how tightly your mandate is drawn — a niche C-suite search behaves very differently from a senior IC role in a deep market. We give you a realistic window on the audit call rather than a number designed to close you.
It's specific work: clean parsing structure, correct section headers, role-matched terminology drawn from the actual posting, and no layout elements that break extraction. Then we make sure it still reads well to the human who sees it after the filter, because clearing the parser alone gets you nowhere.
That's a normal starting point and it's what the Career Audit is for. We work backwards from your track record, the compensation you need, and the work you actually want to be doing, then write the mandate together. A vague mandate is the most common reason searches stall.
No, and be careful with anyone who does — nobody controls a hiring committee's decision. What we commit to is the process: the mandate, the asset quality, the volume and precision of applications and outreach, and transparent weekly reporting so you can see exactly what's being done.
The Career Audit
That is exactly what the audit is for. We read your materials, pressure-test your target, and tell you which of the three would move your search first — or whether you need none of them.
No cost, no obligation, no pitch deck — just an honest read on your search.